As it is now I can use Basic functionality for free (portrait / landscape mode, margins etc.) in 32bit version of ScriptX.

But if I want to use Basic functionality of 64bit version (64bit IE) I have to buy some Licence?

I don't see 64bit version can be downloaded except via some ScriptX Licensee Kit..

Hi

We all work with 64-bit Windows 7 here for which - as I am sure you know - 32-bit IE is the default browser as set by Microsoft.



However if you really have folks deliberately working with the 64-bit IE part then yes, the 64-bit ScriptX module is a  part of our licensee resource kit and is not available 'free'.



I hope that this helps



Jerry



I discovered tonight that opening IE9-64 in administrator mode works on the site I use that requires ScriptX and the UAC messages do not appear as they do when not in admin mode.  ScriptX was working for me in IE9-64 without being in admin mode but for each page change on the site I use, there were 2 UAC messages for ScriptX requesting ability to "make changes to the computer."  So, apparently you don't have to use a 64-bit ScriptX just to use 64-bit IE.  At least that's my experience so far.

Hello support team,

We just found issues that the print function in my .net web application cannot work under 64-bit Windows 7, IE 64-bit.  The version we are using is 6.1.432.1

Is there any solutions or we had to buy some license. Thanks.

Saro

Like I say above, our 64-bit installers are not available to 'free' users of ScriptX. You would need to acquire (at least) a 'standard' publishing license to access our full set of licensee resources.

While you are here, a question. Why would you still be using such an old version of ScriptX when we provde ALL of our binary versions free for you to download and use.

http://scriptx.meadroid.com/knowledge-bank/release-history.aspx

6.1.432.1 was released MANY years ago, and is (naturally) potentially incompatible with every patch, security update and new OS & IE version introduced by Microsoft in the years since.

Why have you not attempted to remain compatible over the years?